An interesting fight is currently being waged between 2 of my success coefficients - with the current proponents being QPP and SNRP (on the LSE).
Both companies had been tweeted yesterday.
The first coefficient relates to the number of trace formulae triggered; the second relates to the number of times the formulae have triggered in the past averaged over the triggered formulae.
The numbers respectively are:
QPP 37 2.946
SNRP 233 2.09
Of note are that all of the numbers for each company are outstanding, 233 is a very high number (and if you remember we carry out around 300,000 per company), with 2.946 also being a respectful number (and has the meaning that from all of the 37 formulae that were triggered yesterday, the number of times these were triggered and reached an 11.5% increase over the subsequent 5 days was 2.946, to get more than 2 triggers is extraordinary)
But lets say we need to go for one, which one to choose. Better number of triggers or better times triggered, or a relationship between these.
But lets say we need to go for one, which one to choose. Better number of triggers or better times triggered, or a relationship between these.
Currently today QPP is up 5.77% and SNRP is up 2.33%, so at the moment it is coming down on the side of tweedle dum (or success coefficient number 2), but I am now looking at the relationship between these numbers.
To complete the set for yesterday and as a note, the remaining tweets were:
PVCS 145 2.000
STCM 31 2.000
AGY 4 2.000
CYAN 15 2.000
For reference I have added these two success coefficients onto the tweeted information